Council of Councils
Think Global Health
Online Store
International efforts, such as the Paris Agreement, aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But experts say countries aren’t doing enough to limit dangerous global warming.
Sanctions Against Russia: Three Things to Know
April 25, 2014 3:54 pm (EST)
- Explainer Video
The Obama administration is poised to enact tougher sanctions in order to mitigate Russian aggression in Ukraine, says Robert Kahn, CFR’s Steven A. Tananbaum Senior Fellow for International Economics. He offers three things to know about the strategy behind sanctions and how they could affect the Russian economy:
More From Our Experts
- Targeted Sanctions Work Best: In issuing sanctions, past cases like North Korea, Iran, and Libya show that globally backed, well-defined sanctions targeting "economic objectives rather than a broad geopolitical agenda" are most effective, says Kahn. Targeted and backed sanctions are more powerful and harder to evade for Russia, since its economy has "deep involvement in global markets," he adds.
More From Our Experts
- Modest Sanctions So Far: Current sanctions only freeze assets and target travel capabilities for a sliver of the Russian economy, including a number of businesspeople and officials, and a bank. The G7, which excludes Russia, and suspended trade talks also play a role in the West’s strategy to ramp up measures that "would send a clear signal without causing unnecessary damage," Kahn says.
More From Our Experts
- Risk of Russian ’Lehman Moment’: Russia’s integrated, highly leveraged, and opaque relationship to global financial markets means that sanctions could exploit a vulnerability to produce what Kahn calls a "Lehman moment: a sharp, rapid deleveraging of the sort that global markets saw after Lehman Brothers collapsed and AIG was bailed out in September 2008." The resulting lack of financing and trust could severely compromise Russian trade and investment capabilities, he adds. But Kahn notes that sanctions alone cannot mitigate the crisis; they must be supplemented with positive measures, such as financial support for Ukraine, to be effective, and the cost of sanctions must be weighed against the costs of inaction and the risk of protracted instability.
More From Our Experts
Top Stories on CFR
Liana Fix, a fellow for Europe at CFR, and Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at CFR, sit down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the future of U.S. policy toward Russia and the risks posed by heightened tensions between two nuclear powers. This episode is the first in a special TPI series on the U.S. 2024 presidential election and is supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Terrorism and Counterterrorism
Violence around U.S. elections in 2024 could not only destabilize American democracy but also embolden autocrats across the world. Jacob Ware recommends that political leaders take steps to shore up civic trust and remove the opportunity for violence ahead of the 2024 election season.
Those seeking to profit from fentanyl and governments seeking to control its supply are locked in a never-ending competition, with each new countermeasure spurring further innovation to circumvent it.