Blogs

Middle East Matters

Robert Danin analyzes critical developments and U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.

Latest Post

U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas wait for photographers to depart before beginning their meeting at the Presidential Palace in the West Bank city of Bethlehem
U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas wait for photographers to depart before beginning their meeting at the Presidential Palace in the West Bank city of Bethlehem (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters).

Reading The Trump Administration in Ramallah

Does the United States seek relations with Hamas in Gaza and to undermine the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) leadership in the West Bank? Palestinians officials and insiders asked me this question repeatedly during a recent visit to Ramallah. At first, the question seems strange. How could well-informed insiders come to wonder if the United States prefers to deal with an Islamist terrorist organization to a leadership that avows non-violence and actively pursues security cooperation with Israel on a daily basis? Read More

Egypt
Voices From Egypt
“On such a dark day, a red day, a black day, people wake up to something that never happened in Egyptian history. We have martyrs with the bullets of the Egyptian army.” –Gamal Abdel-Salam of the doctors’ syndicate at a press conference held in a field hospital “The Egyptian people love the army, and there is no way that we could stand against them.” –Wael Ali, an Egyptian tour organizer “I feel like Egypt is back. We had a disease, and we got rid of it.” –Ayman Abdel-Hakam, a criminal court judge “For Egypt, democracy is chaos.” –Mohamed Abdel Fattah, 24, an advertising manager “When I saw this, I was angry to the absolute maximum ... this is abnormal treatment from the army. It is too tough. This is the way to the edge of the mountain.” –Mohamed Shehab, 25, a medical student, said after clashes between the army and protesters “[Sisi] doesn’t need to order or command us, all he needs to do is give us a wink with one eye, or even just flutter his eyelashes. This is a man adored by Egyptians. And if he wants to take four wives, we’re at his service.” –Ghada Sherif, a columnist for al-Masry al-Youm “The danger we face because of the political situation and the coup is greater than the violence we face in marches.” –Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood member Islam Tawfiq, 26 “Martyrs don’t die. Martyrs go to paradise.” –Muslim Brotherhood activist in Egypt
Middle East and North Africa
Voices From Syria
"Ramadan used to be a time for me to read the Quran, pray and help people with charity but now we are fighting just to get bread, food and enough money to live ourselves," –Abu Marwan, a 50-year-old minibus driver from Zahara, a neighborhood in southern Damascus. “They’ve [government troops] blocked everything here — electricity, phones, water. The only thing they haven’t blocked is the air we breathe.” –Walid Fares, an activist in Hamidiyeh area of Homs “Time is running out for all these [jihadist] groups. They use violence and religion to try control us and, although people are afraid to openly express their dissent, no one wants them.” –Nizar, an activist from Syria’s eastern province of Deir Ezzor “People used to invite all friends and family for the first day of Ramadan, but this year it’s barely heard of. The rituals and traditions of Ramadan are not being practiced.” –Sarah, a 22-year-old resident of Damascus’s Bab Touma neighborhood “This time we will clean Homs completely and will not leave any germs behind us. Homs should be cleaned forever from all traitors. We will retake Homs, whatever the cost and whatever weapons we use.” –Abu Haidar, a pro-government Syrian fighter “We reject this oppressive brand of Islam... We are Muslims. You’re [Al-Nusra Front] just fakes.” –a woman protester in Raqa, Syria “Homs has two nicknames, the city of al-Waleed and the city of jokes. The killer Bashar al-Assad killed the smiles and the jokes from Homs, and now he wants to destroy the mosque.” –Bilal, a Syrian rebel fighter “The money that I saved used to mean security, but with the fall of the pound against the dollar, it means nothing now. I honestly don’t know what to do. I don’t want to keep money in the pound, as I’m scared it might fall again, but I don’t want to sell hard-earned money for quarter the value I got it for.” –Abu Hashim, a 52-year-old Damascus resident whose family owns several shops “For two years, the regime couldn’t retake Homs. Now they want to retake it, but after changing its demographic and sectarian fabric.” –Abu Nizar, 55, a resident of the Ensha’at district in Syria "Where is the international community? What are you waiting for? We hope that you will not go back to the States before you find a solution to the crisis. At least impose a no-fly zone or an embargo…You, as the US government look to Israel with respect. Cannot you do the same with the children of Syria?" –a Syrian woman speaking to Secretary Kerry at the Zaatari refugee camp “If a regular Syrian comes and asks me what we have given him, I don’t know what to say,” –Ahmed, a rebel commander in Syria “We are trying to host our brothers and sisters from across Syria with dignity and respect. But how can we feed hundreds of new families each day when we can barely feed ourselves?” –Ahmed al-Saad, a coordinator with the Local Coordination Committees, an activist network, in the border town of Tal Shihab “Now we can neither return to Homs nor continue to Jordan. We have gone from refugees to prisoners. We Syrians have been left with two options: flee or die.” –Emad al-Homsawi, a Syrian who spent two weeks fleeing Homs "Many nights I can’t sleep because the sound of fighting is so loud. There are more checkpoints than ever before, they now ask for your ID card and your mobile phone, which they then check for text messages, Facebook postings and photographs. We have more restrictions on our movements in Damascus than before, especially at night, there is more mortar fire into regime areas." –a resident of the Mezzeh area of Damascus, home to Syrian regime loyalists "Shiite militias forced us and all the other Sunni residents of my area to leave a few months ago, so all of my family left for Daraa, I moved to another part of Damascus because I have a job with the government and cannot afford to lose it. This Ramadan I miss those social ties, I’ve cried a few times because I’m away from my family, and it’s too dangerous to go to the mosque, even the one next to my house." –Zyad, a 30-year-old Syrian engineer separated from his family
United States
Three Major Challenges for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations
Israeli and Palestinian peace talks are poised to resume after a prolonged hiatus. Six Middle East trips, and tireless efforts by Secretary of State John Kerry made this resumption possible. The talks face three major challenges as a new chapter begins in the twenty year-long saga of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Diplomatic Ambiguity.  One fundamental challenge will be turning the very ambiguity that is enabling talks to resume, into the clarity and transparency necessary for a durable agreement. Vague diplomatic formulas were used to bridge seemingly irreconcilable differences. This allowed both Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Palestinian President Abbas to claim that they did not back down to get talks started. But the goal of negotiations is to put pen to paper. There, transparency will be needed to produce an agreement that resolves core differences, such delineating the Israel-Palestine border. Domestic Constraints.  Secondly, both Israelis and Palestinians will face formidable domestic challenges to making diplomatic progress. Both sides will be negotiating, not only with each other across a table, but also with their own people back home. Resuming talks with Israel are very unpopular amongst Palestinians, even within Fatah and the Palestine Liberation Organization, which President Abbas heads. Abbas’ main political opposition, Hamas, has denounced the talks. Palestinians fear that Israel wants open ended negotiations, and that their political standing will fall without rapid and tangible results from talks. This both constrains Abbas’ ability to be flexible while pressuring him to obtain quick results from Israel. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s domestic situation is also difficult. Some of his main coalition partners oppose the creation of a Palestinian state, as do many of his own Likud party lieutenants. To make negotiating concessions to the Palestinians, Netanyahu may need to realign his political base, and even leave his party to make progress with the Palestinians, as did three earlier Likud leaders-- Arik Sharon, Ehud Olmert, and Tzipi Livni. U.S. Opportunity Costs. The third major challenge concerns the United States. This latest effort to launch talks required sustained, high level engagement by Secretary of State Kerry. Indeed, it has taken up more of his time in office, so far, than any other single issue.  Yet the U.S. faces many other pressing problems of vital national concern in the Middle East and in the rest of the world. At some point soon, Secretary Kerry and President Obama will have to decide if Israeli-Palestinian talks merit the sustained investment of precious time and effort by America’s lead diplomat, or if the Secretary’s energies would better be utilized trying to end the regionally destabilizing war in Syria, manage the delicate road ahead with Egypt, or lead a coalition to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.  Pursuing all of these objectives, while producing an Israeli-Palestinian agreement, will be a major challenge, to say the least.
  • United States
    Middle East Matters This Week: Syria at the UN, Egypt’s Demonstrations, and Israeli-Palestinian Talks
    Significant Developments Syria. Secretary of State John Kerry met Ahmed al-Jarba, the Syrian National Coalition’s (SNC) newly elected leader, late this afternoon at the United Nations to discuss “political solutions” to the Syrian conflict. Al-Jarba met with French president Francois Hollande in Paris yesterday in an effort to push for military and humanitarian aid. United Nations disarmament chief Angela Kane and Swedish chemical weapons expert Ake Sellstrom left Damascus today after a two-day visit to discuss with Syrian officials the scope of the UN’s upcoming inquiry into the alleged use of chemical weapons in the war. Syrian officials seek to limit the panel’s investigation to the suspected March 19 use of sarin gas in Aleppo, while the UN and U.S. are seeking unrestricted access for the investigators. UN Middle East envoy Robert Serry told the Security Council on Tuesday that the international organization has received thirteen reports of alleged chemical weapons use in Syria. In Syria, over two thousand people have been killed since Ramadan began on July 10, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said today. More than 1,323 of the dead were reportedly fighters. Syrian rebels claimed control of western Aleppo on Tuesday, and government troops killed forty-nine rebel fighters in Adra, a suburb of Damascus, on Sunday.  Egypt. The Egyptian Trade Union Federation today announced that five million workers will protest tomorrow in pro-military demonstrations. During a speech to military graduates yesterday, Defense Minister Abdel Fattah al-Sisi called for the Friday demonstrations to provide the military a “mandate” to confront violence and terrorism. “I’m asking you to show the world,” he said. “If violence is sought, or terrorism is sought, the military and the police are authorized to confront this.” The Tamarod movement echoed al-Sisi’s call and voiced its support for the demonstrations, while the Muslim Brotherhood called for counter-demonstrations. Meanwhile, Qatar on Tuesday called for deposed Egyptian president Mohammad Morsi to be released from military detention, adding its voice to calls by the EU, U.S. and Morsi’s family. Nine people were killed and thirty-three others wounded on Tuesday in clashes between opponents and Islamist supporters of Morsi at a Muslim Brotherhood protest at Cairo University. Morsi supporters have been camped out there since the July 3 coup. Israel-Palestine. Preliminary peace talks between Israeli and Palestinian officials are scheduled to begin in Washington on Tuesday, according to the Israeli media. Israeli and Palestinian negotiators Tzipi Livni and Saeb Erekat are slated to meet in Washington next week in order to get negotiations restarted.  Israeli media reports eighty-two Palestinian prisoners would be released by Israel over the next few months as a show of good will. Palestinian officials continue to stress that peace talks will not begin without an affirmation of the 1967 line as the basis for talks. Meanwhile, Secretary of State John Kerry is reportedly building a new team to manage the Israel-Palestine peace talks. Martin Indyk, a former American ambassador to Israel, is reportedly likely to be tapped to head the effort. Click here for my take on Secretary Kerry’s efforts to get the parties to the table. U.S. Foreign Policy Syria. U.S. plans to arm Syrian rebels may face further Congressional hurdles when funding for the classified program runs out on September 30, U.S. officials said today. President Barack Obama will reportedly move forward with plans to arm the Syrian rebels after working with Congress to overcome concerns. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, testified last week before the Armed Services Committee and wrote an open letter to senators on five potential military options for Syria, including limited strikes and establishing a no-fly zone. "The decision to use force is not one that any of us takes lightly. It is no less than an act of war," he wrote. Iran. The U.S. House of Representatives will vote next week on legislation that would severely curtail Iran’s ability to export oil. Legislators aim to toughen sanctions and bring Iranian exports close to zero, which would impact global oil prices and would risk antagonizing China and India, the largest remaining buyers of Iranian crude oil. Egypt. The Pentagon announced yesterday that President Barack Obama has held up delivery of four F-16 fighter planes to the Egyptian air force. Administration officials said that Obama wanted to send Egypt’s military-led government a signal of Washington’s displeasure with the military’s detention of opposition figures. “We’ve been very clear with the military: we understand this is a difficult situation but we want things to get back on track,” a Pentagon official said. “Trying to break the neck of the Brotherhood is not going to be good for Egypt or for the region.” The decision does not mark a suspension of military assistance to Egypt and will not affect the $1.5 billion in American aid. While We Were Looking Elsewhere Tunisia. Mohammad Brahmi, general coordinator of the Popular Movement and member of the National Constituent Assembly, was shot dead this morning outside his home in Ariana. Hours later, thousands of Tunisians protested in front of the Ministry of Interior in Tunis. This is the second killing of an opposition member this year, following that of Chokri Belaid. Iraq. Militants today ambushed a truck convoy with Iraqi Shiites and killed fourteen drivers in a village outside the northern city of Tuz Khormato, the latest in a series of bold attacks. Meanwhile, al-Qaeda claimed responsibility on Tuesday for deadly attacks on the prisons at Abu Ghraib and Taji. The highly coordinated assaults began Sunday evening and involved mortars, suicide bombers, and an assault force, killing at least twenty-five members of the Iraqi security forces. Iraqi officials said eight hundred prisoners had escaped from Abu Ghraib, of whom four hundred have since been re-captured or killed, and that no prisoners had escaped from Taji. “If Al Qaeda can attack a prison, it means they can do whatever they want whenever they want,” said a lawyer, Meluk Abdil Wahab, 45. July has been the deadliest month of 2013 for Iraq, with the death toll at 626 as of Tuesday. Lebanon. The European Union will continue working with the Lebanese government even though Hezbollah is part of it, EU Ambassador Angelina Eichhorst said on Tuesday. Lebanese officials had objected to the EU’s Monday designation of Hezbollah’s “military wing” as a terrorist organization. The move places travel restrictions on selected members and will freeze assets associated with the group. Catherine Ashton, the EU’s top foreign policy official, acknowledged that the designation was “partly a political signal.” Iran. Russian president Vladimir Putin will reportedly meet with Iranian president Hassan Rouhani next month in Tehran to discuss restarting talks on Iran’s nuclear program, Russian and Iranian news media reported today. Putin last visited Iran in 2007. Qatar. The new emir, Sheik Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, will continue aiding Syrian rebels until Syrian president Bashar al-Assad is toppled, Syria’s opposition envoy to Doha said yesterday. Qatar recently gave $5 million to the Syrian National Coalition to purchase humanitarian supplies. This Week in History This week marks the sixty-first anniversary of the 1952 Egyptian Revolution that removed Egypt’s King Farouk from power. On July 23, 1952, General Muhammad Naguib, Colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser and Colonel Anwar Sadat led a coup of the so-called Free Officers against Farouk, whose rule had been criticized for corruption and its defeat in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. Three days later after the coup, Farouk formally abdicated the throne in favor of his son, and a Regency Council was appointed. While the revolution was initially aimed at overthrowing Farouk, the movement had more political ambitions and soon moved to abolish the constitutional monarchy and establish a republic. Naguib, the figurehead leader of the coup, assumed the post of prime minister in September 1952 and established the Republic of Egypt in June 1953. Naguib then became the first president of Egypt, and Nasser became deputy prime minister. In 1954, Nasser removed Naguib from power and proclaimed himself prime minister of Egypt. In 1956, Nasser was elected, unopposed, to the presidency. He died in office in 1970.
  • United States
    Secretary Kerry’s Creative Ambiguity and Israeli-Palestinian Peace Talks
    At the conclusion of his sixth arduous Middle East shuttle Friday night, Secretary of State John Kerry announced the imminent resumption of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks in Washington. Kerry’s circuitous announcement, that the parties had “reached an agreement that establishes a basis for resuming direct final status negotiations,” was short on details and ambiguous, even by diplomatic standards. Such imprecision at first blush suggests that the parties still have a ways to go before the United States’ chief diplomat can declare negotiations fully back on track. But it also reflects a highly creative use of diplomatic ambiguity as a means towards allowing each side to find a way back to the negotiating table. Recall, ever since formal negotiations fell apart in September 2010, Prime Minister Netanyahu has adhered to the position that negotiations should resume without preconditions. Meanwhile, PLO President Mahmoud Abbas has said he will not return to the table without certain assurances: a West Bank settlement freeze and the release of prisoners, for starters. By saying that the parties have not agreed yet to negotiations, but have agreed to face-to-face talks in the U.S. capital, Kerry has found a way for both sides to declare their needs met for an eventual return to negotiations. Netanyahu can say that he succeeded in producing negotiations without preconditions. Indeed, he did just that, issuing a statement twenty-four hours after Kerry’s, welcoming “the resumption of the diplomatic process as this time.” In the wake of Kerry’s announcement, Palestinian officials have insisted that they have not yet agreed to negotiations, only to efforts to secure their demands. That formula allowed Israeli and Palestinian “face-to-face talks” over the course of 2011 and 2012 without calling them negotiations. On Saturday, Israel’s Minister of International Relations announced Israel would release “heavyweight” Palestinian prisoners who have been incarcerated for over twenty years. Such releases are unlikely to occur before talks begin. Thus, Israel will maintain that the release of “pre-Oslo” prisoners, as they are frequently called, is not a payment for negotiations, and the Palestinians will claim just the opposite. Producing such diplomatic sleights of hand is what has made Kerry’s efforts to restart negotiations so challenging.  Yet they are precisely what have been necessary. Perhaps the biggest challenge for American mediators has been producing a formula for the basis of talks. The Palestinian have long held that talks must begin on the basis of the line that demarcated the West Bank from Israel prior to the June 1967 Six Day War. Israel, in turn, has insisted that any terms of reference must include a Palestinian acceptance of Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state as part of any terms for talks. The New York Times reported that Secretary Kerry will issue a statement that negotiations will be based on the 1967 land with land swaps AND recognition of Israel as a Jewish state. The U.S. has reportedly reached understandings that neither side will be forced to publicly endorse these principles. Both Abbas and Netanyahu will be able to claim that they did not cross their red-lines for entering negotiations—an assertion their domestic critics will call legalistic diplomatese. While neither man faces a public clamoring for an active peace process, neither party wants to be accused of foiling an activist secretary of state who has early on staked this issue out as a legacy agenda item. Diplomatic ambiguity of the sort produced by Secretary Kerry will likely allow Israeli-Palestinian negotiations to resume in the immediate period ahead, despite their clear procedural and substantive differences. Yet getting the parties to this point entailed a tremendous investment of political personal prestige and energy. Getting the two sides to agree to an enduring peace agreement will require clarity and transparency—two elements lacking to date. Substantive progress will require Secretary Kerry’s constant engagement and a tremendous expenditure of diplomatic capital. That alone, however, is unlikely to be sufficient.