Automobile Fuel Economy Standards in a Lower-Oil-Price World
Report from Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies
Report from Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies

Automobile Fuel Economy Standards in a Lower-Oil-Price World

November 2015

Report

More on:

Fossil Fuels

Energy and Climate Policy

United States

Overview

Corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards, which require automakers to achieve government-mandated targets for the efficiency of the vehicles they sell each year, can reduce U.S. reliance on oil, cut emissions of greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change, and save consumers money. However, the recent fall in oil prices could undercut the rationale for stringent standards because when gasoline is cheaper, consumers do not save as much on fuel costs when they buy more fuel-efficient vehicles. Ahead of a mandatory federal review of the policies, Varun Sivaram and Michael A. Levi modeled the costs and benefits of CAFE standards under lower oil prices than Barack Obama's administration assumed when, in 2011, it enacted rising standards through 2025. 

The authors find that the stringency of the standards, as currently planned, can maximize net benefits to society even under lower oil prices, assuming that U.S. government estimates of the costs of efficient technologies are correct. Moreover, Sivaram and Levi identify three benefits that federal agencies did not previously consider that make stringent CAFE standards attractive under low oil prices and find that climate change risks are more significant in justifying strong CAFE standards than they were in 2011.

Selected Figures From This Report

Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards versus Actual Fleet Fuel Economy

How Varying Oil Price and Social Cost of Carbon Affect Estimated Benefits of Fuel Economy Standards

How Varying Oil Price and Social Cost of Carbon Affect Estimated Benefits of Fuel Economy Standards

The Effect of Lower Oil Price on the Estimated Benefits of Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards

Effects of 2017 Midterm Review of U.S. Fuel Economy Standards

More on:

Fossil Fuels

Energy and Climate Policy

United States

Top Stories on CFR

Russia

Liana Fix, a fellow for Europe at CFR, and Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at CFR, sit down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the future of U.S. policy toward Russia and the risks posed by heightened tensions between two nuclear powers. This episode is the first in a special TPI series on the U.S. 2024 presidential election and is supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Terrorism and Counterterrorism

Violence around U.S. elections in 2024 could not only destabilize American democracy but also embolden autocrats across the world. Jacob Ware recommends that political leaders take steps to shore up civic trust and remove the opportunity for violence ahead of the 2024 election season.

China

Those seeking to profit from fentanyl and governments seeking to control its supply are locked in a never-ending competition, with each new countermeasure spurring further innovation to circumvent it.