Middle East and North Africa

Palestinian Territories

  • United States
    Obsessive Are the Peacemakers
    Lost in all the reporting and blogging about President Obama’s planned March visit to Israel were the first phone calls his new Secretary of State, John Kerry, made even before entering office.  Even before figuring out how to use his new email, learning the way to the cafeteria, and filling out “Emergency Contact” forms, Secretary Kerry called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli President Shimon Peres and president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas.  Perhaps America’s new chief diplomat was merely extending a courtesy to important Middle East allies or maybe he was giving them a heads-up that the White House was going to announce the president’s visit to Israel and the West Bank or perchance Secretary Kerry wants to have a go at making peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Of these three possibilities, the second seems most likely, but word on the street is that the United States or at least the State Department is about to get back into the peace process game.  As one diplomat related, “Well, it is better than doing nothing.  Maybe Kerry will get lucky. You never know.”  Yes, indeed, you never know, but there are a few things the secretary of state should keep in mind as he declares that peace is possible within two years, begins his shuttle diplomacy, offers bridging proposals, admonishes the parties against unilateral actions, calls for a summit, builds confidence, secludes himself and negotiators at Wye River/Shepherdstown/Camp David, writes a road map, and declares his optimism that the parties are ready for a breakthrough: 1.     The Palestinians’ minimal requirements for peace—half of Jerusalem, return of Palestinian refugees, and a territorially contiguous state with all the attributes of sovereignty, the Israelis cannot deliver.  Even if some Israeli doves think dividing Jerusalem is a good idea, it is practically impossible given all the resources the Israelis have poured into absorbing the eastern part of the city into a greater municipality under exclusive Israeli control.  There could be allowances for some refugees to return to what is now Israel in a hypothetical peace agreement, but not in the large numbers the Palestinians demand.  And given their experience since the 2005 withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, which did not provide Israelis with any greater security (even as they continued to control Gaza), giving up West Bank territory to a weak Palestinian leadership seems like a strategic blunder. 2.     Israel’s minimal requirements for peace—retaining the strategic ridgeline of the Judean and Samarian hills, a presence in the Jordan Valley, and the demilitarization of the state of Palestine are non-starters for the Palestinians.  If the Palestinians were to agree to Israel’s minimal requirements they might as well agree to nothing at all.  The best they would get is a seat at the UN, which they practically have, and the short-terms hosannas of a cynical international community.  At worst, it would bring about a round of intra-Palestinian bloodletting as no doubt Hamas and other hardliners would work overtime to kill an agreement that did not hand the whole of historic Palestine over to the Palestinians. The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is not ripe for resolution, as they say. There are, of course, policies that the United States can undertake to create an environment more conducive to serious negotiation, but Washington has neither the political will nor the leverage with either party to make that happen.  One would think that the demographic realities would move the Israelis, but the fact that there will be more Arabs between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea in the coming decades has not moved Israelis in large numbers to demand fundamental change in the status quo.  This has much to do with the fact that they cannot be assured of security if they withdraw, thereby making way for a Palestinian state.  The immediate result is deadlock, which it is not earth shattering to suggest makes it difficult to find an equitable solution to the conflict overtime. It is not clear why the new Secretary of State wants to wade into this morass of bleakness and frustration.  There has got be a better reason than “someone’s got to do it.”  I, for one, believe the secretary’s time is better spent de-escalating tensions between China and Japan in the East China Sea or attending to global climate change or working to prevent Egypt from melting down—important issues to which one can at least imagine a resolution.    
  • Middle East and North Africa
    Is Insulting the President a Crime: Ramallah This Time
    On January 23, I did a blog post here noting that in his short time in power Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi had 24 times had people jailed for the "crime" of "insulting the president." My comment then was that "This is a striking example of the way in which Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood are ruling Egypt, and should give pause to those who believe the Brotherhood can be won over to a belief in democracy and respect for human rights." Now comes a new case, this time in the Palestinian Authority. Ma’an News Agency reports that "A Palestinian court has sentenced a man from the Nablus area to a year in prison for insulting President Mahmoud Abbas on Facebook, officials said Thursday. The Nablus magistrates court sentenced Anas Saad Awwad, 26, of Awarta village, in absentia to a year in prison after convicting him on charges of criticizing the government, an official said." What was the terrible insult? "Awwad’s lawyer, Rima al-Sayyed, said her client has been accused of photo-shopping of Abbas wearing a Real Madrid shirt with the caption: ’A new striker.’" Awwad’s father noted that his son had merely posted something on Facebook and said "I ask the president to intervene personally to cancel the court’s decision." Now that is good advice. He might have noted that Real Madrid is one of the richest and best football teams in the world, so one has to wonder why this is a criminal insult anyway. Real Madrid has a far better record in its particular field of play than the Palestinian Authority does in its own. Abbas should buy the young man lunch--and end entirely the pernicious and repressive practice of jailing anyone, ever for the so-called "crime" of insulting the president.
  • Israel
    Middle East Matters This Week: Israel Strikes Syria, Egypt Seeks Unity, and Iran Upgrades Enrichment
    Significant Developments Syria. Israel reportedly conducted an airstrike inside Syria on Wednesday for the first time since 2007, igniting protests from the Assad regime as well as Syria’s allies Iran, Russia, and Hezbollah. Conflicting reports have emerged about the target; U.S., Israeli, and Lebanese sources have been quoted claiming Israel struck a convoy carrying advanced SA-17 anti-aircraft weapons heading into Lebanon. Syrian sources claim that Israeli jets had bombed a defense research center near Damascus. Israel has declined to make any official comment on the strike. Syria’s ambassador in Beirut said that Damascus could take a “surprise decision” in response to the attack. Sheikh Ahmad Moaz al-Khatib, Syria’s opposition leader, suggested on Wednesday that he is willing to negotiate with Syrian president Bashar Assad’s regime to end the civil war. Al-Khatib’s unprecedented compromise proposal, conditioned on the release of thousands of prisoners, provoked outrage from some factions of the Syrian opposition. This led Al-Khatib to qualify that he was only expressing his own personal opinion, not that of the Syrian National Council.  Meanwhile, the United Nations reported on Wednesday that donor countries had pledged about $1.5 billion this week to help Syrian refugees. The amount exceeded the UN’s target, though the agency has yet to receive previously pledged funds. The UN also claims that if the humanitarian situation inside of Syria continues to deteriorate, the new funding would only sustain operations for several additional months. Egypt. Rival political groups held talks today under the auspices of Grand Imam Ahmed al-Tayyeb of Al Azhar. The unique meeting addressed Egypt’s recent political violence that has killed nearly sixty people. Secular opposition figures Mohammed ElBaradei and Amre Moussa of the recently formed National Salvation Front attended along with Saad Katatni, the head of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party. The talks came a day after the National Salvation Front and the Islamist Nour Party called on Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi to form a national unity government. Morsi rejected the idea, however, saying a new government would only be formed in April after new parliamentary elections. Morsi said “there is a stable government working day and night in the interest of all Egyptians.” On Tuesday, Egypt’s top general, Defense Minister General Abdul Fattah el-Sisi, warned that Egypt’s political fractures could lead to the “collapse of the state.” His dire warning followed widespread violence that broke out last week in Cairo, Alexandria, and Suez. Ensuing riots that erupted in the city left at least thirty-nine civilians and two police officers dead. On Sunday, Morsi declared a month-long state of emergency in the three towns of Port Said, Suez, and Ismailia, leading to charges of Mubarak-like actions. Iran. Non-proliferation officials believe Iran intends to upgrade its nuclear enrichment equipment at Natanz, the main Iranian nuclear enrichment plant. Yukiya Amano, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, reportedly circulated a letter through the agency from Iranian officials on January 24 that stated that Iran was going to upgrade its centrifuge machines from IR1 models to the more reliable IR2M. The move would allow Iran to greatly accelerate its ability to enrich uranium. Meanwhile a spokesman for Catherine Ashton, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, expressed frustration and disappointment over Iran’s rejection of proposed negotiations on January 28 and 29 in Istanbul. EU officials have continuously proposed dates for negotiations since December, but Iran has yet to agree to new talks. While We Were Looking Elsewhere Yemen. The Yemeni army suspended a military offensive against an al Qaeda-linked stronghold yesterday in order to pursue negotiations to secure the release of three kidnapped Westerners. Eight thousand soldiers were engaged in the assault which began on Monday following the breakdown of initial efforts to free the hostages. Meanwhile, Yemeni authorities seized a boat in its territorial waters carrying a large amount of explosives and money that American officials claimed was sent from Iran for insurgents inside Yemen. Bahrain. Human Rights Watch accused Bahrain’s ruling family of prioritizing “repression over reform” in its World Report 2013 released today. The ruling family called for a national dialogue, which Sheikh Ali Salman, the leader of the main opposition party Al Wefaq, has reportedly welcomed. Meanwhile, a home-made remote-detonated bomb exploded in Bahrain’s capital, Manama, yesterday, wounding at least three police officers. Iraq. Gunmen killed two Iraqi soldiers and kidnapped three others in a series of attacks in Fallujah on Saturday after troops fired on a crowd of anti-government protesters killing seven people one day earlier. Friday’s deaths were the first in weeks of increasingly angry and volatile demonstrations calling for Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s resignation. A curfew was imposed in Fallujah Friday evening. Palestine. Hamas officials in Gaza decided yesterday to allow the Central Elections Commission (CEC) to begin voter registration in partial fulfillment of the much-delayed reconciliation deal between Hamas and Fatah. CEC chief Hanna Nasser said that he hopes efforts to begin registering new voters will begin in a week to ten days. Meanwhile, Israel announced yesterday that it will make a one-time payment of $100 million to the Palestinian Authority in response to the PA’s cash-strapped financial situation. Israel stopped delivering the monthly tax revenues to the PA after Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas went to the UN to upgrade Palestine to “observer state status” in October.  
  • Israel
    Voices From the Region: Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, UAE
    “It’s a very big victory for the Islamic groups...They are the strongest in Syria now because the Western countries won’t help.” – The director of the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights using the pseudonym Rami Abdulrahman, speaking about the rebel capture of a key military air base last week “I was once asked: If I came to power, would I let Christian women remain unveiled? And I said: If they want to get raped on the streets, then they can.” – Hesham al-Ashry, an Egyptian preacher in an interview with Al-Nahar TV last week “My reading is that they’re waiting till the election, till they get everything. And when they’re done taking over all the seats of power, then they can focus on us.” – Nahed Adly, a Coptic Egyptian on the Islamists’ rise to power “I see a confluence of several factors that altogether can contribute towards a strong push to solve this 65-year-long conflict.” – Jordanian king Abdullah yesterday speaking about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict “So we rejected that and said it’s better they die in Syria than give up their right of return.” – Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas in response to Israel’s reported agreement to allow Palestinian refugees fleeing Syria to return to the West Bank and Gaza in exchange for signing a statement giving up their right of return to Israel “Whoever wants me as a strong prime minister cannot have a strong prime minister while weakening me…I think there is only one way to guarantee that the right continues to govern Israel, and that is to vote for me.” – Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu “They both want to export the revolution…What the Muslim Brothers are aiming for at the moment is to shred and denigrate the reputation of the Gulf rulers.” – Dubai police chief Dahi Khalfan on the similar threats from the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran “Our purpose is to prevent revenge killings…The best way to do that is to arrest the responsible persons, put them in prison and have them answer to the law.” – Ali al-Azir, one of about three hundred attorneys in the Free Syrian Lawyers Committee working to collect war crimes testimonies “It sounded more like gloating than making promises.” – Alia, a loyalist resident of southern Damascus on Syrian president Bashar’s recent speech  
  • Palestinian Territories
    Middle East Matters This Week: Assad Stalls, Palestinians Talk, and Iraq Explodes
    Significant Middle East Developments Syria. Syrian president Bashar al-Assad gave his first speech in nearly seven months on Sunday, outlining a "peace plan" that ruled out any negotiation with Syria’s armed rebels. UN-Arab League envoy Lakhdar Brahimi called Assad’s speech “uncompromising” and said that the Syrian president could not be part of any transitional government-the closest Brahimi has come to calling for Assad’s resignation; Syria’s foreign ministry called Brahimi “flagrantly biased.” Russian and U.S. diplomats are scheduled to meet with Brahimi tomorrow in Geneva. Meanwhile, NATO officials condemned Syria for indiscriminately launching unguided, short-range missiles for the third time in the past week, accusing the regime of “utter disregard for the lives of the Syrian people.” Meanwhile, the Syrian government agreed to release more than two thousand prisoners in exchange for forty-eight Iranians held by rebels. The Iranian government claimed that all of the hostages had been pilgrims visiting a Shiite shrine near Damascus, but the rebels claimed they were active members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. Palestine. Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas met Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal in Cairo yesterday for the first time in over a year. The meeting was orchestrated by Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi, who also met with each of the faction leaders in an effort to renew reconciliation efforts. An Egyptian official involved in the negotiations said that the two had agreed to implement their previously agreed upon reconciliation pact and claimed that another meeting would take place in the first week of February to set an implementation timetable. Iraq.  A wave of bombings across central and eastern Iraq today killed at least nine people and wounded sixteen others amidst escalating sectarian tensions. Parliamentary opponents of Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki announced yesterday that they had gathered enough signatures to summon the prime minister to parliament for a no-confidence vote. The announcement follows more than two weeks of protests sparked by the arrest of Finance Minister Rafe al-Essawi’s bodyguards. While We Were Looking Elsewhere Libya. Interim president Mohammed al-Megarif survived an assassination attempt on Saturday while he was staying overnight in the southern desert. Three of Megarif’s bodyguards were wounded when gunmen opened fire at his hotel. Libya’s chronic instability and concerns over its ability to ensure regular oil production, prompted Prime Minister Ali Zidan yesterday to threaten to use force to impose order. Meanwhile, the main border crossing between Libya and Tunisia at Ras Jedir reopened today after hundreds of people protested the closure. Prime Minister Zidan will meet Tunisian prime minister Hamadi Jebali and Algerian prime minister Abdelmalek Sellal in Ghadames on Saturday to discuss joint border security concerns. Jordan. Syrian refugees living in the Zaatari refugee camp attacked Jordanian aid workers with stones and sticks on Tuesday after winter storms destroyed their tents and flooded the camp. Seven aid workers were reported injured. The UN has estimated that it needs at least 500 million dollars to help the more than 280,000 Syrian refugees estimated to be living in Jordan. Egypt. The Egyptian central bank announced a new foreign exchange system yesterday in a move intended to curb speculators but that could also precipitate increased wheat and oil prices. Meanwhile, Qatari prime minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassem al-Thani announced on Tuesday that Qatar would double its financial assistance to Egypt with an extra 2.5 billion dollars. A technical committee from the International Monetary Fund is expected in Cairo in a couple of weeks to resume negotiations over a 4.8 billion dollar loan. This Week in History Monday marked the sixty-seventh anniversary of the founding of Turkey’s Democratic Party. The DP became the country’s first opposition party to rise to power and end the era of one-party rule. Founded on January 7, 1946, the DP gained political traction following Turkish president Ismet Inonu’s decision in 1945 to open up the country’s political system. While some members of the ruling Republican People’s Party (CHP) wanted to suppress the DP, Inonu decided that a multiparty system would allow for a possible change in government and decided to abandon the title of “National Unchangeable Leader.” In the 1950 election, the DP won 54 percent of the vote and 396 out of 487 parliamentary seats, sweeping Ataturk’s CHP from power for the first time. The ten years of subsequent Democrat rule was marked by political instability, culminating in the imposition of martial law and a 1960 military coup that imprisoned the Democrat party leaders.  
  • Palestinian Territories
    Ramallah and Riyadh
    Two recent headlines produce a certain amount of cognitive dissonance. The first is "Fayyad: PA is on the verge of bankruptcy" while the second reads "Saudi budget surplus hits $103 billion." In the first story, Prime Minister Fayyad notes that several factors contribute to the financial crisis. Israel is not passing Palestinian Authority tax revenues through to the PA, which he calls a "fatal blow." But he also notes that Arab countries--which in December promised a $100 million a month safety net should Israel do just that--are not helping. Why not? “I have no explanation. Frankly, I don’t know what is going on,” Fayyad said. In the second story we learn that Saudi Arabia had a $102.9 billion dollar budget surplus in 2012. Moreover, since expenditures for 2012 were $227 billion and planned expenditures for 2013 are $218.7 billion, unless oil prices collapse a huge surplus can be expected for 2013 as well. Of course the first claim on Saudi oil revenue is clearly domestic spending--and it is also true that the Kingdom donated $100 million to the PA in the summer of 2012 and $200 million in 2011. If that seems generous, consider this summary from the Library of Congress of U.S. aid: From FY2008 to the present, annual U.S. bilateral assistance to the West Bank and Gaza Strip has averaged nearly $600 million, including annual averages of approximately $200 million in direct budgetary assistance and approximately $100 million in non-lethal security assistance for the PA in the West Bank. The remainder—approximately $300 million on average per year—is dedicated to project assistance for the West Bank and Gaza through U.S. government grants to nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). The European Union is also extremely generous, and in September announced that it was doubling its 2012 aid package from roughly $150 million to $300 million. And this comes, as does the U.S. aid, in a year of enormous fiscal pressure on both sides of the Atlantic. In this context, the Saudi gift of $100 million isn’t generous and isn’t enough. Not in a year when the budget surplus will run one hundred billion dollars. In his speech on behalf of the Kingdom to the UN General Assembly in September, the Saudi king’s son Abdulaziz bin Abdullah said that "Saudi Arabia, for one, is sparing no effort to meet all its obligations towards the peace process and towards our Palestinian brothers by the provision of various types of support and assistance." Other oil producers should pitch in as well, of course, but the Saudis traditionally lead this effort and should do far more.
  • United States
    The "State of Palestine" and the PLO Office in Washington
    Palestinian National Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has begun to use "State of Palestine" on all official documents, stationery, and stamps. This is “to implement the resolution of General Assembly of the UN on Nov. 29 to recognize Palestine as a non-member state,” according to the official Palestinian news agency. There is a Palestinian office in Washington—but it represents the PLO, not the “State of Palestine” or the Palestinian National Authority that governs the West Bank and receives millions of dollars in American aid. That PLO office is doing most of the things an embassy does. According to its web site, it has a “Government Affairs” department that “is responsible for strengthening the relationship between the PLO and the US Government’s Executive branch,” a “Congressional Affairs” department that is “in charge of reaching out to and building relations with both the House and Senate,” and media, public affairs, and community outreach offices. The key difference is the name: “PLO Delegation” rather than “Embassy of Palestine” or “Palestinian National Authority Delegation.” Why not have a “State of Palestine” embassy? Simple. There should not be an “Embassy of Palestine” because the United States does not believe there is today a “State of  Palestine.” American policy is that there should some day be such a state, but as the product of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations that conclude a final status agreement. Then why not be happy with the status quo, a PLO office? First, the PLO is a group with a long terrorist history. Second, even today the PLO Charter (1968) is filled with pernicious nonsense about “the basic conflict that exists between the forces of Zionism and of imperialism on the one hand, and the Palestinian Arab people on the other,” and relies on concepts like “commando action,” the “Arab masses,” and “popular liberation war.” Its outlook is summed up in this line: “The Balfour Declaration, the Mandate for Palestine, and everything that has been based upon them, are deemed null and void. Claims of historical or religious ties of Jews with Palestine are incompatible with the facts of history and the true conception of what constitutes statehood.” All of this led Congress in 1987 to forbid a PLO office: It shall be unlawful…. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, to establish or maintain an office, headquarters, premises, or other facilities or establishments within the jurisdiction of the United States at the behest or direction of, or with funds provided by the Palestine Liberation Organization or any of its constituent groups, any successor to any of those, or any agents thereof. As Congress permitted, that provision has been waived repeatedly by President Obama (as it had been by Presidents Bush and Clinton), and in 2010 he even upgraded the PLO office’s diplomatic status. But that was before the UN General Assembly magically turned the “non-state observer” called the PLO into the “non-member state” called Palestine. That event ought to give us pause, and lead us to re-think whether a PLO rather than PNA office is a good idea. In addition to the PLO’s historic baggage and its offensive Charter, a third reason to stop dealing with the PLO is that it is a non-democratic body. The PNA is theoretically a democratic one whose leadership is chosen through popular elections. Of course that’s highly theoretical, because the last national elections were held in 2006 and the terms of the entire parliament and of President Abbas expired long ago. Still, isn’t accepting the hypocrisy of the PNA about democracy preferable to honoring the unreformed, hopelessly compromised PLO, in whose Charter the word “democracy” does not even appear? It isn’t as if doing so would contravene the practices of the Palestinians themselves. Back home in Ramallah, the foreign minister hasn’t been calling himself “Foreign Minister of the PLO.” Rather, his web site says he is “Foreign Minister of the Palestine National Authority” and the PNA’s main web site says the same thing. Moreover, under the Palestinian “Basic Law,” the PNA president and not the PLO chairman “is the Commander-in-Chief of the Palestinian Forces,” “shall appoint and terminate the services of the National Authority’s delegates to foreign countries, international organizations and foreign agencies,” and “shall accept the credentials of foreign delegates to the Palestinian National Authority.” No doubt there are contradictions here: the PNA was established under the Oslo Occords with jurisdiction only over domestic affairs. The language of the Gaza-Jericho Agreement outlining the structure of the new PNA specifically said its “jurisdiction does not include foreign relations.” Perhaps for that reason the Palestinian official theoretically charged with negotiating with Israel, Saeb Erekat, is not a PNA official: he is still called the head of the PLO’s Negotiations Affairs Department (whose web site makes it clear that it is a PLO, not a PNA, body). Some of those contradictions may become even more convoluted now, with the Palestinian leadership proclaiming a “State of Palestine.” Perhaps the foreign minister will now be called “Foreign Minister of the State of Palestine” rather than “Foreign Minister of the Palestine National Authority,” and perhaps there will be an effort to change the names of all the overseas delegations from “PLO” to “State of Palestine.” Meanwhile, some members of Congress have been trying to force the closing of that PLO office in Washington. After that UN vote in late November, Senators Schumer, Graham, and Barrasso tried unsuccessfully to insert amendments to the defense spending bill to close the PLO office, and in December the outgoing and incoming chairmen and ranking members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee wrote to the President asking him to do the same. Of course, these members of Congress are not suggesting substituting a “State of Palestine” embassy or a PNA office for the PLO office—just closing the PLO office down. But it would be foolish today to permit no Palestinian representation in Washington. Our officials deal with President Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad every day, and the PNA (not the PLO) governs the West Bank and receives millions of dollars in American aid. We view the PNA (not the PLO) officially as the embryonic government of the future Palestine. But it is long past time to stop issuing the waivers, to close the PLO office, and to deal straightforwardly with the PNA. If “reconciliation” brings Hamas back into the PNA’s structures, U.S. government lawyers may conclude in 2013 as they did in 2006 that the PNA is controlled by a terrorist group. All aid would likely be suspended then as a matter of law as well as a matter of policy. That would be the moment to close the office entirely. Now’s the time to end the PLO official presence here.
  • Israel
    Voices From the Region: Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Israel, Palestine, Iran, Yemen
    “The Iraqi spring is coming.” – Moqtada al-Sadr, an Iraqi Shiite leader, expressed support for further demonstrations against Iraqi prime minister Nuri al-Maliki in a speech in Najaf on Tuesday “The failure of the international community, in particular the Security Council, to take concrete actions to stop the blood-letting, shames us all…Collectively, we have fiddled at the edges while Syria burns.” – UN high commissioner for human rights Navi Pillay “Mubarak knew everything, big and small.” – Habib Adly, former interior minister under Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak reportedly to a commission investigating the killings during the Egyptian uprsing in early 2011 “No one will change my opinion about Abu Mazen…even if they say I cannot express it because I’m the president. [Israel] must complete the task of reaching a peace agreement with the Palestinians without further delay.” – Israeli president Shimon Peres in broadcast remarks “America is the only nuclear criminal in the whole world. It is the only country in the world, which has used nuclear weapons against innocent people. It is the only country that has the highest quantity of nuclear weapons at its disposal.” – Saeed Jalili, Iran’s supreme national security council secretary “Everyone knows that Hamas could take over the Palestinian Authority…It could happen after an agreement; it could happen before an agreement, like it happened in Gaza. Therefore, as opposed to the voices that I have heard recently urging me to run forward, to make concessions and to withdraw, I think that the diplomatic process must be managed responsibly and sagaciously and not in undue haste.” – Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday “The message today is that Fatah cannot be wiped out…Fatah lives, no one can exclude it and it seeks to end the division.” – Amal Hamad, a member of the Fatah on the party’s first mass rally in Gaza in five years “The former president [Saleh] will not risk going to Italy, which has granted him an entry visa, due to the ease of his being prosecuted there, as well as fears of being assassinated in a country where the mafia are active.” – An official Yemeni source quoted by Asharq Al-Awsat “The children’s thoughts are in red…Even many of their drawings are done entirely in red.” – Mustafa Shakr, a former principal in Damascus who now runs a school for more than three hundred Syrian children along the Turkish-Syrian border “The plan at the moment is to help over five million people by 2013. That’s a quarter of the Syrian population being uprooted…It is the largest humanitarian crisis in the world right now, so we need an urgent financial response.” – Panos Moumtzis, the UN regional coordinator for Syrian refugees “We suffer from the cold and we are poor here but we are safe…When we came here we thought we would stay one week, maybe one month, but it’s been six months and now we learn to live with the uncertainty.” – Abu Abdel Hadi, a Syrian refugee in Jordan
  • Palestinian Territories
    Arafat and the Second Intifada
    Analysts have long debated the role of Yasir Arafat in the second intifada, the violent Palestinian uprising that followed on the failure of Camp David in 2000. The PLO and Palestinian Authority (PA) have long denied that Arafat was behind the violence, instead calling the second intifada a spontaneous uprising. This claim was endorsed in the so-called Mitchell report, the "Sharm el-Sheikh Fact-Finding Committee" of 2001: "We have no basis on which to conclude that there was a deliberate plan by the PA to initiate a campaign of violence at the first opportunity...." That story began to fall apart for good in 2010, when Hamas leader and co-founder Mahmoud al-Zahar stated that “President Arafat instructed Hamas to carry out a number of military operations in the heart of the Jewish state after he felt that his negotiations with the Israeli government then had failed." Now there is an additional source: Arafat’s widow, Suha. In an interview in December on Dubai TV she said this: Yasser Arafat had made a decision to launch the Intifada. Immediately after the failure of the Camp David [negotiations], I met him in Paris upon his return, in July 2001 [sic]. Camp David has failed, and he said to me: “You should remain in Paris.” I asked him why, and he said: “Because I am going to start an Intifada. They want me to betray the Palestinian cause. They want me to give up on our principles, and I will not do so. I do not want Zahwa’s friends in the future to say that Yasser Arafat abandoned the Palestinian cause and principles. I might be martyred, but I shall bequeath our historical heritage to Zahwa [Arafat’s daughter] and to the children of Palestine. The debate over Arafat’s role should be over. Many Palestinian leaders have always understood it to be a phony, in any event. I recall a conversation about five years ago with one PA official, whom I asked whether he shared the fears expressed then in the press about a new intifada. No, he replied, because such things do not start spontaneously. The last one started when the Palestinian leadership decided to start it, but the current leadership is against violence--so there will be no intifada. Let’s hope that remains true. But meanwhile, there should be no doubt about the origin of the second intifada: it happened when Yasir Arafat decided that more violence was useful to him. That case is closed.
  • Israel
    A Final Note From 2012
    Last week I posted my take on the most significant Middle East developments of 2012. The ten developments that I identified, in chronological order, were: The cold war with Iran heats up The Muslim Brotherhood’s election in Egypt Syria’s descent into civil war The Innocence of Muslims anti-American riots The killing of U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi Political unrest in Jordan The Israel-Hamas November conflict The United Nations recognition of Palestine as a non-member state International failure to stop Syria’s bloodshed The Muslim Brotherhood’s struggle to consolidate power in Egypt Two readers of Middle East Matters provided thought provoking alternatives worthy of mention: One colleague suggested that the death of Saudi crown prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz, following the death of his brother and former heir apparent Prince Sultan bin Abdel Aziz the previous year, marked an important generational change underway in the kingdom’s leadership. A second colleague suggested six excellent alternatives: Political paralysis in Saudi Arabia The descent into civil war between the Kurds and other groups in Iraq The diminished Middle East role of Turkey’s prime minister Erdogan The success of Israel’s new Iron Dome system The rise of Middle East Salafists The spread of Qatari influence in the Middle East These were indeed important developments in 2012, a difficult and eventful year for the Middle East. The year ahead promises to be no less turbulent and momentous. In my next blog we’ll look at the year to come. Remembering Chris Stevens: The tragic death of Ambassador Stevens continues to touch those who knew him. He was the best of the best and a friend. His family has set up a very moving website to remember him, share memories, or give to a fund established in his honor to build bridges between the people of the United States and the Middle East. I urge you to take a look: http://RememberingChrisStevens.com.
  • Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
    Tested by Zion
    A former top National Security Council officer in the Bush White House tells the full inside story of the Bush administration and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • Egypt
    Voices From the Region: Turkey, Egypt, Gaza, Syria, Iraq, Yemen
    “He’s contaminated from top to bottom…Tomorrow he will be a hero.” – Captain Adnan Dayoub, a Syrian rebel commander in Hama, on the defection of General Abdelaziz Jassim al-Shalal, head of the military police “I have reached a clear conclusion that a lot of the policies and efforts contradict with my personal beliefs and I don’t see them as representative of our people’s aspirations.” – Egyptian communications minister Hani Mahmoud in a resignation letter published on his Wasat Party’s Facebook page “It is out of question for us to take a step backward…Furthermore, we have not been asked to take such a step.” – Turkish energy minister Taner Yildiz on Turkey continuing to import gas from Iran “The country’s going to the pits. Everything is a mess…It’s worse than ever. Mubarak was better than now. People were living and there was security.” – Hamdy Hussein, a 61-year-old building janitor reflecting on Egypt’s economic instability “Shalal did defect but he was due to retire in a month and he only defected to play hero.” – a Syrian security source said of the defection of General Abdelaziz Jassim al-Shalal, head of the military police “Our entire village is angry at the government and the Americans…If the Americans are responsible, I would have no choice but to sympathize with al-Qaeda because al-Qaeda is fighting America.” – Ahmed Mohammed, a 27-year old Yemeni survivor of an American drone strike “Injustice, marginalization, discrimination and double standards, as well as the politicization of the judiciary system and a lack of respect for partnership, law and constitution ... have all turned our neighborhoods in Baghdad into huge prisons surrounded by concrete blocks.” – Iraqi finance minister Rafia al-Issawi at a Sunni demonstration protesting Iraqi prime minister al-Maliki “It’s the first time since 2007. It’s part of the dialogue, the conversation that we have with the Egyptian side and because of the calm…If the calm will continue, then more eases will go through. We’re also working on improving the electricity system in the north of Gaza in order to promote and to improve the electricity in that area.” – Guy Inbar, a spokesman for the Israeli defense ministry body that coordinates with the Palestinians confirmed the new policy of easing its blockade on Gaza to allow the import of construction materials “There have been mistakes in the past period that I take responsibility for…I have had to take many tough decisions, but now a new dawn shines and the goals of the people will be achieved.” – Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi in a televised address last Wednesday
  • Israel
    American Support for Israel Steady--With Exceptions on the Left
    The newest Pew poll of American opinion about the Middle East shows support for Israel steady, with exceptions. Here is the bottom line: For decades, the public has sympathized with Israel over the Palestinians and that remains the case today. Overall, 50% say they sympathize more with Israel, compared with just 10% who say they sympathize more with the Palestinians; almost a quarter (23%) do not offer an opinion while 13% volunteer that they sympathize with neither side, and 4% say both. Attitudes on this question have been stable over the past six years, after showing more volatility in the middle of the last decade. But within the stable totals, there lie important differences: There continue to be stark partisan differences in Middle East sympathies. Conservative Republicans maintain strong support for Israel with fully 75% saying they sympathize with Israel compared with just 2% who sympathize with the Palestinians. By contrast, liberal Democrats are much more divided: 33% sympathize more with Israel, 22% with the Palestinians. Those are remarkable numbers: conservative Republicans are more than twice as supportive of Israel as liberal Democrats, among whom support for Israel is not very much greater than support for Palestinians. When I point out these numbers, and others like them, to Democratic Party leaders they usually get angry and say "Israel should not be a partisan issue. Stop making Israel a partisan issue." That’s a foolish reply, for every poll I have seen in recent years gives the same general result. Support for Israel on the Left--in Europe, in America, in the Democratic Party--is eroding. That’s an obvious fact. It is visible in Pew’s religious data as well: Among religious groups, white evangelical Protestants remain strongly supportive of Israel. Two-thirds (67%) say they sympathize more with Israel; only 5% say they sympathize more with the Palestinians. But among white mainline churches, support for Israel drops twenty points to 47 percent. For Israel’s supporters in the American Jewish community, all this data shows where friends and allies are and where they are not: they are on the right, not on the left. Of great concern to supporters of Israel will also be the age data, showing that support for Israel drops sharply among the young: 58 percent of those over sixty-five but only 38 percent of those under thirty sympathize more with Israel. The Pew poll also asks about intervention in Syria, and finds that it has little support. As fighting in Syria rages on between government forces and anti-government groups, the public continues to say that the U.S. does not have a responsibility to do something about the fighting there. And there continues to be substantial opposition to sending arms to anti-government forces in Syria....Only about quarter of Americans (27%) say the U.S. has a responsibility to do something about the fighting in Syria; more than twice as many (63%) say it does not....Similarly, just 24% favor the U.S. and its allies sending arms and military supplies to antigovernment groups in Syria, while 65% are opposed. As to Syria, partisan differences are small. The only recent crisis where a majority said the United States had some responsibility to act was Darfur, where 51 percent said yes and only 36 percent said no in 2006--presumably because it was viewed as a case of true genocide, and I would guess because so many churches paid close attention to Sudan. These numbers help explain why the Obama administration has been so passive about Syria: it believes public opinion does not favor action. But what is cause and what is effect? The administration’s passivity reflects but also molds public opinion, and real leadership in Washington might have produced different public views. As to Israel, the polls show that in the president’s own party, and among his best supporters on the left in that party, sympathy for Israel is falling. Here too one may wonder what is cause and what is effect. Has the president’s apparent lack of deep enthusiasm and understanding for Israel moved opinion on the left, or does it reflect that opinion?
  • Israel
    Voices From the Region: Israel, Syria, Egypt, Palestine, Turkey
    “For decades the Assad regime was talking about the Palestinians’ rights….But Bashar al-Assad has killed more of us today than Israel did in its latest war on Gaza.” – Abu Ammar, Palestinian resident of Yarmouk camp after it was attacked by Syrian fighter jets on December 16 “I read this as a strong vote against the dismal, confused performance of the Morsi administration.” – Emad Shahin, AUC political scientist on first round of referendum vote “We are not in the business of regime change. Some of the regional players were suggesting to us ’Why don’t you tell President Assad to leave? We will arrange for some safe haven for him’…My answer is very simple: if indeed those who suggested this to us have this in mind, they should take it directly to President Assad. Why should they use us as a postman?” – Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov in a television interview “Turkey is now the world’s biggest prison for journalists, a sad paradox for a country that portrays itself as a regional democratic model.” – France-based Reporters Without Borders said in a statement “The opposition cannot decisively settle the battle and what the security forces and army units are doing will not achieve a decisive settlement.” – Syrian vice president Farouq al-Shara “The reason Israel owes us money each month is because we import goods from Israel…So it becomes a legitimate question for me to ask how to minimize the amount of our money that will be subject to Israel’s capricious behavior.” – Palestinian prime minister Salam Fayyad “If this constitution passed, there will be no stability.” – Mohammed El Baradei, one of the leaders of the Egyptian opposition National Salvation Front before the second day of voting on the draft constitution “The wise and the elite in Europe, the United States, and Turkey should dismantle Patriots and take them away from the region before a fire breaks out.” – General Hassan Firouzabadi, chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces
  • United States
    Middle East Matters’ Ten Most Significant Developments of 2012
    Here it is: the second annual Middle East Matters year-end roundup listing the ten most significant Middle East developments of 2012. Since this blog focuses on the interplay between U.S. policy and the region, the items selected were those deemed most noteworthy from an admittedly American foreign policy perspective. This was a tumultuous year in the region, and many items on this list could have been deemed the single most significant. So in roughly chronological order are MEM’s top ten for 2012: 1.     The Cold War with Iran Heats Up International tensions with Iran over its nuclear program escalated dramatically in 2012. At several points, it seemed that military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities was imminent, if not inevitable. The year began with President Obama signing into law “crippling sanctions” on Iran, and the European Union agreeing to impose an unusually strong oil embargo. Iran threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a refrain it would maintain throughout the year. The United States built up its naval forces in the Strait in July, as Israel increasingly warned that Iran was about to enter a “zone of immunity”—a term coined by Defense Minister Ehud Barak to signify a moment when Iran’s program would no longer be vulnerable to Israeli military action. As the summer heated up, so too did the regional sense that an Israeli strike might be impending. U.S. and Israeli national security officials, who sustained a seemingly unprecedented pace of high-level consultations throughout the year over Iran, seemed to differ less over analysis than on policy. As tensions mounted into September, President Obama issued his strongest statements to date before the United Nations General Assembly, declaring, “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.” Days later, Israeli prime minister Netanyahu told the same international body that Iran must be prevented from concluding its second stage of enrichment necessary to make a bomb, which he said would be finished by next spring or summer. Israel, in effect, seemed to give key international negotiators until spring 2013 to force Iran to back down before the question of Israeli military action would have to be definitively contemplated. International efforts to bring about a halt to Iran’s nuclear program, one way or another, will likely crescendo, perhaps conclusively, in the year ahead. 2.     Muslim Brotherhood Elected in Egypt The previously-banned Muslim Brotherhood was voted into power this year in Egypt’s first free and fair elections. In January, the Muslim Brotherhood mobilized its supporters and won 47 percent of the parliament’s seats. In April, as Egypt prepared for its presidential elections, the Supreme Presidential Electoral Commission disqualified ten candidates from running for president, including the Muslim Brotherhood’s chief strategist Khairat el-Shater. Instead, the Muslim Brotherhood nominated the relatively unknown Mohammed Morsi, mocked in Egypt as the Brotherhood’s “spare tire.” Nonetheless, Morsi was able to exploit the Muslim Brotherhood’s strong grassroots network and highly organized team, emerging victorious in June by beating former Mubarak prime minister Ahmed Shafiq in a run-off election. Morsi was sworn-in to office as Egypt’s fifth president on June 30, becoming Egypt’s first civilian president and the first democratically elected Islamist Arab head of state. 3.      Syria Descends into Civil War Syria’s already violent uprising became a full-fledged civil war in 2012. Fighting in the conflict that had first erupted in March 2011 had been limited to certain parts of the country, away from the largest population centers. In July 2012, however, full-fledged fighting erupted in Syria’s two largest cities: Damascus and Aleppo. The opposition inflicted a major blow on the regime with its July 18 bombing of the National Security headquarters in downtown Damascus, killing four of the regime’s senior-most officials, including Defense Minister Rajiha, Assad’s brother-in-law and Deputy Defense Minister Assef Shawkat, Security Bureau head Hisham Ikhtiar, and Hassan Turkmani. While the regime immediately unleashed efforts to establish control, it has still failed. Just this week, Vice President Farouk al-Shara conceded that victory was not at hand for the regime. Whereas at the beginning of the year some five thousand Syrians had died, according to U.N. officials, that estimate is now seven to tenfold greater with the number of Syrians killed nearing fifty thousand. Syria’s civil war has had a significant spillover effect on its neighbors. The UNHCR estimates that more than half a million Syrian refugees have registered, or are awaiting registration, in nearby countries, with the number growing by three thousand daily. Violence from the war has spilled across Syria’s borders, with clashes occurring between Syrian and Jordanian forces, mortar and artillery exchanged between Syria and Turkey, and with mortar fire into the Israeli-occupied Golan triggering the first IDF firing into Syria since the 1973 war. 4.     The Innocence of Muslims Anti-American Riots A movie trailer defaming the Muslim prophet Mohammad, posted on YouTube, precipitated a string of violent and deadly anti-American protests that began on September 11 with the storming of the U.S. embassy in Egypt. The demonstrations quickly spread throughout much of the Muslim world. The Arabic-dubbed version of the fourteen minute-long movie trailer titled The Innocence of Muslims inspired demonstrators to breach the U.S. embassy compound in Cairo and burn the post’s American flag. Hundreds of protesters armed with rocks and Molotov cocktails clashed in Tahrir Square the following days, as demonstrations quickly spread across the region to Yemen, Lebanon, Tunisia, Morocco, Gaza, Tel Aviv, Iran, Iraq, and Sudan. Demonstrators stormed U.S. embassies in Yemen, Tunisia, and Sudan, while the American school in Tunis was looted and burned. President Obama telephoned Egyptian president Morsi and urged him to call off government-inspired demonstrations. Obama publicly labeled the film “crude and disgusting,” but noted that the United States could not ban the video because the Constitution protects the right to practice free speech, a message many Middle Easterners found hard to believe. 5.     U.S. Ambassador Killed in Benghazi Terrorists attacked the U.S. Benghazi consulate on September 11, killing ambassador Christopher Stevens, State Department official Sean Smith, and CIA contractors Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods. Chris Stevens was the first American ambassador killed in the line of duty since 1988. Initially erroneously reported as a spontaneous protest over the anti-Muslim film, the Innocence of Muslims, the attack was later confirmed to have been a planned assault by Islamist militants. To this date the perpetrators remain unknown, though the Libyan Islamist militia Ansar al-Shariah is suspected of having been involved and possibly having led the attack. U.S. intelligence officials are still investigating the possibility of ties between Ansar al-Sharia, which espouses jihadi theology, and other suspected involved militants to Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. The Benghazi attack took place against a backdrop of instability and violence that has spread throughout Libya in the wake of last year’s uprising that overthrew Muammar Qaddafi. Libya’s General National Congress recently designated seven southern military areas restricted zones with the aim to improve security and stem the flow of weapons, militants, and narcotics that currently flow freely across Libya’s borders. Today, the country’s weak security forces still exert little authority at best, particularly in the south, which has witnessed a dramatic increase in violent tribal conflict. Events in Libya demonstrate the challenge of establishing fully functioning, if not democratic, institutions in countries where dictators had centralized all power and authority in the figure of one person. The events of this year’s 9/11 in Libya continue to reverberate throughout American politics today. 6.     Unrest in Jordan Mid-November demonstrations in Jordan that left at least one demonstrator dead, precipitated by the lifting of fuel subsidies, led to some instant predictions of an Egypt or Tunisia-like uprising in the Hashemite kingdom. With some demonstrators calling for the end of King Abdullah’s rule, a clear and ominous red-line in Jordan’s political discourse was indeed crossed. Demonstrations are, however, part of Jordan’s political culture, and the country clearly faces severe economic and political challenges. At least two hundred thousand Syrians have taken refuge in Jordan, energy expenditures account for over 30 percent of the government’s budget, and overseas assistance has declined, while the country faces the same youth bulge sweeping the rest of the region. What has Jordan observers worried is the fusion of economic discontent, anger at perceived government corruption, and the frustration within some of the East Bank tribes. To date, the Hashemites have been able to deflect popular discontent onto the government; King Abdullah sacked four prime ministers in the past year alone. But Abdullah recognizes that more needs to be done. Jordan will hold new parliamentary elections on January 23 as part of the king’s reform initiative. However, the Islamic Action Front, Jordan’s leading Islamist party, is boycotting the election. The key challenge facing the regime is to ensure that the elections and their aftermath are truly transformative and that Jordanian political institutions are seen as the appropriate fora for addressing political grievances. With Iraq to the east, Syria to the north, Palestine to the west, and Egypt to the south, Jordanians see unrest all around. While a source of inspiration for some, it is a cautionary sign for most Jordanians. Nonetheless, Jordan faces significant challenges and will doubtlessly experience major bumps on the immediate road ahead. 7.      Israel-Hamas November Conflict Hamas-Israel violence erupted into a major military confrontation in mid-November that was quieted after sustained high-level American and Egyptian diplomatic efforts. On November 14, Israel assassinated Hamas’ military mastermind Ahmed Jaabari and other top officials in Gaza following a prolonged period in which hundreds of rockets and mortar were fired into southern Israel. In the ensuing fighting, Israel destroyed much of Hamas’ imported Iranian-produced Farj-5 missiles and other high-value military targets. Undeterred, Hamas sent rockets deep into Israel’s heartland for the first time since Saddam Hussein fired rockets at Israel in 1991. With Israel threatening to send ground troops into Gaza—a move that many feared would test the durability of the Israel-Egypt peace treaty under the new Morsi government—President Obama, traveling in Asia, intervened to help quiet the situation. After at least a half dozen phone calls between Obama and Egypt’s recently elected Islamist president and the dispatch of Secretary of State Clinton to the Middle East, a cease-fire was announced on November 21. That Clinton curtailed her trip with the president to broker a halt to Israeli-Palestinian violence symbolized the conflict’s ability to suck American diplomacy back into the region despite the administration’s attempts to pivot its focus towards Asia. The conflict also drew post-revolutionary Egypt into a central brokering role between Israel and Hamas at Washington’s behest. In doing so, many asked whether the United States and Egypt were lapsing back into the pre-revolutionary compact whereby Egypt acts to preserve regional stability in exchange for American largesse and a blind eye towards Cairo’s domestic conduct. It also fortified Hamas’ centrality as the address responsible for all groups in Gaza, diminishing the organization’s international isolation. While the Israel-Gaza border has subsequently remained largely quiet, the situation there is extremely fragile and could easily deteriorate quickly once again. 8.      The United Nations Recognizes Palestine as Non-Member State The United Nations General Assembly voted overwhelmingly on November 29 to upgrade Palestine to the status of non-member observer state by a margin of 138 votes in favor, 9 against, and 41 abstentions. The United States and Israel led a vocal minority that included Canada and the Czech Republic, while the United Kingdom and Germany abstained. France led a contingent of EU countries supporting the upgrade. Following the vote, Secretary of State Clinton called the move “unfortunate and counterproductive.” While thwarted in his original effort to win recognition at the Security Council fourteen months earlier, the General Assembly vote marked a symbolic victory for President Abbas and a PLO desperate to demonstrate the benefits of their diplomatic approach in contrast to Hamas’ strategy of “resistance.” Abbas consistently has maintained that his statehood gambit is compatible with a return to peace negotiations. Israel, however, has interpreted Abbas’ move as a punitive unilateral act of confrontation, not as a move to facilitate talks or future cooperation. The confrontational perception was fortified in the vote’s run-up when the Palestinians reportedly rejected U.S. and Israeli efforts to gain assurances that the Palestinians will not challenge Israel and individual Israelis in international fora, most notably the International Criminal Court. Prime Minister Netanyahu immediately announced measures to accelerate settlement activities in the occupied territories and withhold tax remittances to Abbas’ government. With no apparent prospect of imminent reconciliation or negotiations between Abbas and Netanyahu, and with Hamas appearing to be on the political ascendancy, it remains unclear whether President Obama intends to once again make the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a top administration priority for his second term. 9.     International Failure in Syria The international community failed over the course of 2012 to halt Syria’s ongoing bloodshed, bring about Bashar al-Assad’s departure, or effectuate a meaningful political process for ending the country’s civil war. Twice in 2012, China and Russia exercised their veto in the Security Council—in February against an Arab League-backed resolution calling upon Assad to step down, and then again in July against a proposed resolution imposing economic sanctions on Syria. The dual-hatted UN-Arab League envoy to Syria, Kofi Annan, proposed a 6-point plan in March to end the fighting and initiate a political transition that was endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly. A joint Arab League-UN observer team was dispatched to support the Annan effort, but its movements were constrained and their presence seemed only to intensify the regime’s determination to employ brutal violence to end the civil war. The plan never gained any traction on the ground and Annan announced his resignation in early August. Former Algerian foreign minister Lakhdar Brahimi was appointed in his place later that month, though his efforts have faced the same limitations as Annan’s. International efforts towards Syria instead centered largely on supporting Syrian opposition groups. The Free Syrian Army reportedly received significant weapons and financial assistance from the Gulf, allowing it to make some dramatic gains inside Syria. Meanwhile, in November, Secretary of State Clinton helped lead an effort to forge an alternative to the deeply divided Syrian National Council. That new group, the Syrian Opposition Coalition, was recognized by Washington as the legitimate representative of the Syrian people in December, and has also been recognized by more than one hundred other countries. Given the failure of international diplomacy to stave off Syria’s civil war, it seems almost certain that the country’s fate will be determined by developments on the ground. 10. Muslim Brotherhood Strives to Consolidate Power in Egypt On November 22, just one day after garnering international recognition for his role in brokering an Israel-Hamas ceasefire, Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi shocked Egypt by issuing a decree granting himself broad sweeping powers outside judicial review. Morsi used these new self-appointed powers to ensure that the Islamist dominated constituent assembly tasked with writing a new constitution could not be subject to the judiciary’s scrutiny. Morsi tried to market his move as a temporary measure designed to ensure the revolution’s continued progress. Instead, Morsi precipitated immediate accusations of tyranny and dictatorship, spurring secular oppositionists to form the National Salvation Front, led by Mohammed El-Baradei, Hamdeen Sabbahi, and Amre Moussa. Hundreds of thousands of protesters poured into the streets to demonstrate against the president’s decree. Precipitating further violent protests, the Islamist-dominated constituent assembly submitted a draft constitution that was quickly approved by Morsi, who then put in place a national referendum that is currently on-going. Having put the constitution to a vote, Morsi recently rescinded many elements of his initial decree. Yet he also instructed the military to provide extraordinary security, spurring charges that Egypt was now under martial law. The military’s backing of Morsi and his efforts demonstrated a close working partnership between the Muslim Brotherhood and the armed forces. To date, Morsi has proven to be effective, if not heavy handed, in imposing his will upon the Egyptian people while diminishing popular support for the Muslim Brotherhood along the way. With new parliamentary elections slated for early next year, it is to be seen if Egypt’s challenges will be resolved peacefully through newly revamped institutions, or if rising discontent and seemingly insurmountable challenges will lead to more violence and political action in the country’s streets.