Global Commons

  • Arctic
    The Arctic Is Integral to U.S. National Security
    The Arctic should be a major consideration in discussions of U.S. national security, says Thad Allen, co-chair of CFR’s Independent Task Force on the Arctic. 
  • Arctic
    U.S. Needs to Plan for Changes in the Arctic
    The Arctic holds a grip on the public imagination as a frozen, remote, and inaccessible place – but the Arctic region is rapidly changing, and the United States would do well to take stock of the changing reality at the top of the world and plan for a very different future there. CFR is today releasing a new report on the Arctic. I asked my colleague Anya Schmemann to explain the stakes for the United States in the Arctic. A new Independent Task Force report sponsored by CFR notes that the Arctic region is warming at twice the rate as the rest of the planet. The melting sea ice is opening up the region to new trade routes and commercial activities. Indeed, last summer a large passenger cruise ship sailed through the Northwest Passage for the first time in history. But with new opportunities come new risks, and the United States needs to bolster its strategic commitment to the region, invest in infrastructure and telecommunications, and safeguard the Arctic’s environment, people, and wildlife. The United States is an Arctic nation thanks to Alaska, and it has significant strategic, economic, and scientific interests in the region. As the United States concludes its chairmanship of the Arctic Council this May, the Task Force finds that the United States lags behind other Arctic nations, such as Russia, that have updated their strategic and commercial calculations to take advantage of the changing conditions stemming from the opening of the region. The report notes that while Russia has numerous ice-breaking vessels and China is building a third icebreaker, the United States owns only two operational icebreaking ships—one heavy icebreaker and one medium-weight icebreaker—to serve both the Arctic and the Antarctic. Noting that icebreakers are required for a range of maritime missions to support U.S. security, economic, and commercial needs, the Task Force recommends that the United States fund and build additional icebreakers. The report, Arctic Imperatives: Reinforcing U.S. Strategy on America’s Fourth Coast, also finds that the United States needs greater investment in Alaskan infrastructure, including deepwater ports, roads, and reliable telecommunications, to support economic development and a sustained security presence in the region. The Task Force identifies six main goals that U.S. policymakers should pursue to protect U.S. economic and strategic interests in the Arctic: Ratify the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The Senate should help secure the United States’ legal rights to more than 386,000 square miles of subsea resources along its extended continental shelf by ratifying this treaty. Fund and maintain polar ice-breaking ships. Congress should approve funding for additional icebreakers to improve operational capacity in the Arctic, ideally to have at least three operational ships in the polar regions at any one time. Congress should also safeguard funding for the Coast Guard, which plays a critical role on the region. Improve Arctic infrastructure. Invest in telecommunications, energy, and other infrastructure in Alaska and find locations for safe harbor ports and a deepwater port. Strengthen cooperation with other Arctic nations. Continue diplomatic efforts within the Arctic Council and work with other Arctic states, including Russia, on confidence-building and cooperative security measures. Support sustainable development and Alaska Native communities. Uphold the Arctic Council’s focus on sustainable development, environmental protection, and continued involvement of the Arctic’s indigenous peoples. Fund scientific research. Sustain budget support for scientific research to understand the regional and global impact of accelerated climate change. The Task Force is chaired by Thad Allen, retired admiral and former commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard, and Christine Todd Whitman, former administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and governor of New Jersey, and is directed by Esther Brimmer, executive director and chief executive officer of NAFSA: Association of International Educators, and a recent CFR adjunct senior fellow. Watch the release event here and read the report here.
  • Arctic
    Arctic Imperatives
    Overview “The United States, through Alaska, is a significant Arctic nation with strategic, economic, and scientific interests,” asserts a new Council on Foreign Relations-sponsored (CFR) Independent Task Force report, Arctic Imperatives: Reinforcing U.S. Strategy on Americas Fourth Coast. With the Arctic “warming at twice the rate as the rest of the planet” and melting sea ice opening up this resource-rich region to new trade routes and commercial activities, the report stresses that “the United States needs to increase its strategic commitment to the region or risk leaving its interests unprotected.” Chaired by Thad Allen, retired admiral and former commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard, and Christine Todd Whitman, former administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and governor of New Jersey, the Task Force finds that the United States lags behind other Arctic nations that have “updated their strategic and commercial calculations to take advantage of the changing conditions stemming from the opening of the region.” The report notes that while Russia has numerous ice-breaking vessels and China is building a third icebreaker, the United States owns only two operational icebreaking ships—one heavy icebreaker and one medium-weight icebreaker—to serve both the Arctic and the Antarctic. Asserting that “icebreakers are a national capacity” required for a range of maritime missions to support U.S. security, economic, and commercial needs, the Task Force recommends that the United States fund and build additional icebreakers.  The report also finds that the United States needs greater investment in Alaskan infrastructure, including deepwater ports, roads, and reliable telecommunications, to support economic development and a sustained security presence in the region. Currently, “almost no marine infrastructure is in place within the U.S. maritime Arctic.” The bipartisan Task Force is composed of twenty experts from diverse backgrounds. The project is directed by Esther Brimmer, executive director and chief executive officer of NAFSA: Association of International Educators, and a recent CFR adjunct senior fellow for international institutions. As the United States concludes its chairmanship of the Arctic Council this May, the Task Force identifies six main goals that U.S. policymakers should pursue to protect the United States’ growing economic and strategic interests in the Arctic: Ratify the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The Senate should help secure the United States’ legal rights to more than 386,000 square miles of subsea resources along its extended continental shelf by ratifying this treaty. Fund and maintain polar ice-breaking ships. Congress should approve funding for up to six icebreakers to improve operational capacity in the Arctic, so as to have at least three operational ships in the polar regions at any one time. Improve Arctic infrastructure. Invest in telecommunications, energy, and other infrastructure in Alaska and find locations for safe harbor ports and a deepwater port. Strengthen cooperation with other Arctic nations. Continue diplomatic efforts within the Arctic Council and work with other Arctic states, including Russia, on confidence-building and cooperative security measures. Support sustainable development and Alaska Native communities. “Maintain the [Arctic] Council’s focus on sustainable development, environmental protection, and continued involvement of the Arctic's indigenous peoples.” Fund scientific research. Sustain budget support for scientific research beyond 2017 to understand the regional and global impact of accelerated climate change. For a full list of the Task Force’s findings and recommendations, read the report [PDF], Arctic Imperatives: Reinforcing U.S. Strategy on Americas Fourth CoastProfessors: To request an exam copy, contact [email protected]. Please include your university and course name. Bookstores: To order bulk copies, please contact Ingram. Visit https://ipage.ingrambook.com, call 800.234.6737, or email [email protected]. ISBN: 978-0-87609-706-9
  • Monetary Policy
    Global Monetary Policy Tracker
    CFR’s Global Monetary Policy Tracker compiles data from 54 countries around the world to highlight significant global trends in monetary policy. Who is tightening policy? Who is loosening policy? And what is the policy stance of the world as a whole?
  • Global
    The World Next Week: March 9, 2017
    Podcast
    India's most populous state announces election results and Europe's first set of pivotal elections takes place in the Netherlands.
  • Global
    Cyber Strategy and Policy: International Law Dimensions
    In testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on March 2, 2017, Matthew C. Waxman addressed some of the international law questions most relevant to cyber threats and U.S. strategy and made recommendations for U.S. leadership in the evolution of related international rules. Waxman argued that even though international law regarding cyber capabilities is not yet settled, existing rules can support a strong cyber defense strategy. Since many of the international law questions depend on specific, case-by-case facts, and are likely to be highly contested for a long time to come, the United States should continue to advance interpretations that support its strategic interests and effectively constrain other states’ behavior. Takeaways: International law is relevant to U.S. cyber strategy because it helps influence opinions and shape reactions among audiences abroad, and it may be useful in preserving international stability and setting, communicating, and reinforcing “red lines.” When the government agrees internally on rules and obligations, it can speed up decision-making, and when allies agree on them, it can provide a basis for cooperation and joint action. Well-established international legal rules, such as the prohibitions on the use of force by states against each other and the right to self-defense against armed attacks, can effectively be applied to new technologies and can accommodate a strong cyber strategy. However, precise answers about the application of international law to cyberattacks are not likely to be worked out any time soon. The U.S. government’s interpretation if the UN Charter as applied to cyberattacks leaves open how the United States would respond to an attack that does not cause physical destruction but nevertheless massive harm. The United States should therefore continue to establish specific mutual restraints on cyberattacks among other states, along with confidence-building measures. In approaching legal questions, the United States should consider how the rules or interpretations it seeks to defend might constrain its own cyber operations as well as help justify other states’ actions. The U.S. interpretation of sovereignty in the cyber context could have a significant impact on its options for cyber operations. The principle of sovereignty would not necessarily prohibit cyber operations just because some of those activities take place within another state without its consent, even if they have some effect on its cyber infrastructure.
  • Global
    The World Next Week: March 2, 2017
    Podcast
    Syria awaits the outcome of the latest round of Geneva peace talks and China holds its annual plenary session of the National People's Congress.
  • Global
    The State of the World: Honoring the James H. Binger Chair in Global Governance
    Play
    Experts discuss the state of the world.
  • Global
    The World Next Week: February 23, 2017
    Podcast
    President Donald J. Trump addresses Congress, the UN Security Council debates Kosovo, and the 89th Academy Awards are held.
  • Global
    The World Next Week: February 16, 2017
    Podcast
    The search for a new White House national security advisor continues, the UN Security Council reviews Yemen sanctions, and Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe celebrates his 93rd birthday.
  • United States
    Water and U.S. National Security
    Play
    As part of the Center for Preventive Action's Flashpoint Roundtable Meeting Series, Joshua Busby, associate professor of public affairs at the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, and David Michel, nonresident fellow at the Stimson Center, discuss global water issues and their effect on U.S. national security.
  • Global
    The World Next Week: February 9, 2017
    Podcast
    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets with President Donald J. Trump, Germany hosts the annual Munich Security Conference, and Iran commemorates the anniversary of the 1979 revolution.