Blogs

Development Channel

The Development Channel highlights big debates, promising approaches, and new research and thinkers addressing opportunity and exclusion in the global economy.

Latest Post

Mossack Fonseca law firm sign is pictured in Panama City, April 4, 2016.
Mossack Fonseca law firm sign is pictured in Panama City, April 4, 2016. Carlos Jasso/Reuters

Corruption Brief Series: How Anonymous Shell Companies Finance Insurgents, Criminals, and Dictators

The latest paper in the Corruption Brief series from the Civil Society, Markets, and Democracy program at the Council on Foreign Relations was published this month. In the brief, Dr. Jodi Vittori, senior policy advisor at Global Witness, addresses the myriad problems posed by anonymous shell companies – corporate entities with few or no employees and no substantive business, which offer a convenient way to privately move money through the international financial system.

Read More
Americas
The West Steps Forward in the Fight Against Female Genital Mutilation
Emerging Voices features contributions from scholars and practitioners highlighting new research, thinking, and approaches to development challenges. This article is by Becky Allen, former intern in the Women and Foreign Policy program. Female genital mutilation (FGM)—a practice that poses severe health risks to women and girls—is widespread in the developing world: of the women and girls living in the twenty-nine African and Middle Eastern countries where the practice is most prevalent, more than 125 million have been cut. Widely considered a form of violence against women, studies indicate that FGM can result in both psychological and physical consequences. Yet FGM occurs in the Western world as well. Activists claim that FGM has been on the rise in both Britain and the United States in recent years, especially given increased rates of immigration from countries where the practice is prevalent. A 2014 study by the City University London and Equality Now found that over 137,000 women in England and Wales have undergone FGM. Another 20,000 girls are at risk each year in the United Kingdom. In the United States, where the practice is masked in greater secrecy, the numbers are difficult to determine, though some estimates put the figure in the hundreds of thousands. In response to this growing issue, the British government and UNICEF co-hosted Britain’s first annual Girl Summit to raise awareness of FGM on July 22. The summit aimed to launch a movement to eradicate the practice within a single generation. As Susan Bissell, chief of child protection for UNICEF, affirmed: it’s time to “up our game”—even in the West. So far, the British government is following through on its mission. Prime Minister David Cameron announced that tougher legislation will make it illegal for parents to subject their daughters to FGM. The existing 1985 British law banning the practice targets the performer of FGM or the guardian responsible for taking a girl to undergo the procedure abroad. Even so, local authorities have knowingly overlooked perpetrators of FGM. It was not until this year—thirty years after the law was enacted—that a successful prosecution occurred in Britain. The British government has also pledged £1.4 million (about $2.4 million) to establish an effective system for identifying girls who are at risk for FGM in Britain. Under the new system, special training will be provided to teachers, social workers, health professionals, and police officers. Moreover, the country’s citizens have been mobilized to act on this front: just last week two doctors teamed up to open the world’s first clinic for child victims of female genital mutilation. In addition to providing medical and psychological support, the clinic will liaise with police, social services, and community groups to identify and safeguard girls who are at risk for the procedure. Lastly, Britain has increased training sessions for airport personnel, teaching them to identify both potential victims and performers of FGM. Not only do parents take their daughters to their native countries to be cut, but a new trend in which “cutters” come to Britain to perform the practice has also recently emerged. Since the launch of this operation in July, thirty families have been stopped according to Gatwick Airport officials. The United States has joined Britain in the campaign to end FGM. Last month, the Obama administration announced plans to conduct a national study that will research the consequences and risks of FGM in the United States. The U.S. government also recently developed a preliminary working group on FGM, which is expected to devise strategies for fighting the practice through education. The strategy taken by the Obama administration will help policymakers develop a nuanced understanding of FGM before enacting relevant legislation. The approach stands in contrast to a 2010 proposal by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which suggested that the United States legalize a “ceremonial pinprick” of girls to dissuade families from taking their daughters abroad to undergo the full procedure. The 2010 proposal sparked an uproar, raising questions about the nature of FGM and parents’ intentions. As one critic pointed out, “We don’t let people… beat their wives a little bit because they’re going to do it anyway.” The United Kingdom and the United States have the opportunity to step up in the fight against FGM in their countries. Through new legislation, enforcement of existing laws, and training programs for personnel who are in the position to identify girls at risk, these nations can address the growing issue of FGM in their own backyards.
Economics
From the Board Room to the Factory Floor, Employing Women Is Smart Business
Emerging Voices features contributions from scholars and practitioners highlighting new research, thinking, and approaches to development challenges. This article is by Henriette Kolb, head of the Gender Secretariat at the International Finance Corporation (IFC), and Nasim Novin, consultant at the IFC Gender Secretariat. As Hillary Clinton said during the 2014 Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) Annual Meeting in New York City earlier this week,  "We cannot grow the global economy if we do not open the doors to women to participate in the economy." Research from the past decade clearly demonstrates the economic case for women’s full participation in the labor force. Strategy& (formerly Booz & Co) estimates that increasing women’s presence in the workforce to the same level as men’s could boost GDP by 5 percent in the United States, 12 percent in the United Arab Emirates, and 34 percent in Egypt. And according to McKinsey & Company, companies with more women on boards and in top management perform the best. Yet across the world, women face persistent barriers in the job market, often the result of discrimination and culturally entrenched ideas about gender roles. In fact, the World Bank’s Gender at Work report finds that women’s participation in the labor force has stagnated over the last two decades, declining from 57 to 55 percent worldwide. Of the women who are empowered to participate in the global workforce, more than half are engaged in the informal economy, rather than in salaried or wage jobs. With the world economy struggling to revive in the aftermath of the global recession, now is the time to remove the obstacles to women’s paid employment and reap the economic and societal benefits of women’s full economic participation. The private sector is increasingly taking on this task, as more and more companies become convinced that including women at all levels of their organizations is a business imperative—and not just a corporate social responsibility or public relations issue. Demonstrating their commitment to promoting women’s private sector employment, ten companies recently joined the She Works partnership initiative announced by World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim at the CGI Annual Meeting. Kim urged other companies to follow their lead, emphasizing that empowering women in the workplace is essential to achieving the World Bank’s goals of reducing absolute poverty and boosting shared prosperity. The unique partnership with CGI brings together leading multinational companies that have already made significant progress toward gender inclusion in their workplaces—Care.com, Coca-Cola Company, Ernst & Young, Gap Inc., and Intel Corporation—with leading firms based in emerging markets—Belcorp, Kuwait Energy, Odebrecht Group, Ooredoo Group, and Zulekha Hospitals. Each company has pledged to implement measures that are proven to enhance women’s employment opportunities, such as mentorship programs, flexible working arrangements, company-wide gender assessments, and leadership training to increase diversity in management. The partnership also provides a platform for companies to meet, share best practices, and learn from one another. It presents a unique opportunity to exchange and adapt lessons between the developed world and emerging markets. Working with critical partners, such as the EDGE Certified Foundation, the International Labour Organization, and the UN Global Compact, the World Bank Group will facilitate knowledge-sharing events and develop practical approaches that companies can implement to improve gender equity in the workplace. Partnerships to enhance women’s employment are vital to scale up those programs that are already proven to be effective. She Works is expected to improve employment opportunities for more than three hundred thousand women across the world over the next two years. Considering approximately 865 million women worldwide have the potential to contribute more fully to their national economies, this is just a drop in the bucket. More energy and attention from both governments and the private sector is needed to chip away at that daunting number. Nevertheless, this initiative is an important starting point. By drawing on the thought leadership and convening power of the World Bank Group, combined with the practical experience of companies, this type of partnership can have catalytic power. The World Bank Group calls on other companies to use the example set by the She Works partnership to actively promote gender equality in the workplace, thus creating the momentum needed to grow the global economy, end absolute poverty, and increase shared prosperity.
Emerging Markets
Food Security and the Need for Responsible Investment Guidelines
Emerging Voices features contributions from scholars and practitioners highlighting new research, thinking, and approaches to development challenges. This article is by Gregory Myers, director of private sector engagement at Cloudburst Group and former division chief for the Land Tenure and Property Rights Division at the U.S. Agency for International Development. Over eight hundred million people in the world do not have enough to eat. In fact, hunger kills more people every year than malaria, AIDS, and tuberculosis combined. But feeding the world’s growing population cannot be achieved through government action and public resources alone. Instead, governments and international organizations should encourage responsible investment in agriculture from a wide range of private sector actors, particularly those with large land-based investments. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, both based in the United States, have already begun reviewing their supply chain processes and are doing more to foster responsible investment. In Europe, Unilever, Nestlé, and Rabobank are also working to address challenges related to “land grabbing.” Yet governments and the private sector need to do more. Achieving genuine progress on this front will require coordination by a variety of actors. It is encouraging that many groups—NGOs, companies, international donors, and governments—are now focused on this issue. In August, the UN Committee of World Food Security (CFS) negotiated a long sought-after set of global principles to guide responsible investment in agriculture (RAI), mainly for application in emerging economies. Although the ten RAI principles are not without controversy, the document marks an important step toward reducing food insecurity for women, men, and children while promoting sustainable economic growth. Paired with another set of principles, the Voluntary Guidelines for the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries, and Forests, the RAI can facilitate clear, transparent, and predictable rules, laws, and policies that secure property rights and promote investment in ways that both benefit local populations and contribute to global economic growth. Together, these principles could dramatically improve the nature and outcomes of global development efforts by changing both how investment in agriculture in emerging economies takes place and, most importantly, who benefits from these investments. These principles complement other investment guidelines, such as the UN’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Protecting land and resource rights is essential to responsible investment, the fight against hunger, and economic growth. With secure property and resource rights, local people and communities are granted new economic opportunities: they can rent out land to prospective investors or enter into joint ventures with them. In addition, when people believe their land and resource rights are secure, they are more likely to invest in their property, which can increase crop yields and thereby improve household incomes and reduce hunger and food insecurity. Respecting and protecting these rights can also benefit investors by reducing the financial and reputational risks of investing in economies with weak property rights systems. Implementing these principles and turning good ideas into real change requires more than setting guidelines. Therefore, world leaders, international donor organizations, civil society, and the private sector should create an independent, multi-stakeholder platform to develop practical tools to make the promise of the RAI and the guidelines for responsible governance a reality. An example of such a platform is the Kimberley Process, which prevents trafficking in conflict diamonds. A multi-stakeholder platform could develop a gold standard industry certification, which would set clear expectations for how investors should conduct business with respect to land in emerging economies. These standards would also empower civil society to monitor investments in a more systematic way and allow consumers to reward companies that behave responsibly and pressure those that do not. Next, policymakers should experiment with models at the local level to create more profitable investment relationships between commercial and smallholder farms that result in better food security, nutrition, and economic outcomes for all. These could be piloted through country-level, multi-stakeholder partnerships similar to those launched under the Group of Eight (G8) last year. Finally, this multi-stakeholder platform should improve information sharing and learning by establishing common data standards and procedures that allow information to be compared and shared more easily. The time is ripe to capitalize on the growing investor interest in agriculture and the movement to develop more responsible investment models, and thus achieve powerful results for local people and communities. Through concentrated efforts, responsible agricultural investments can drive local economic growth and propel millions out of extreme poverty.
  • Development
    Unlocking the Potential of Women Entrepreneurs
    This post is from Isobel Coleman, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) senior fellow and director of the Civil Society, Markets, and Democracy initiative, and Dina Habib Powell, global head of corporate engagement at Goldman Sachs and president of the Goldman Sachs Foundation.  A staggering six hundred million new jobs are needed globally over the next fifteen years to keep employment rates at their current level. This is especially daunting given slowing global growth rates. One bright spot in this enormous challenge is a powerful, and often overlooked, source of job creation: women entrepreneurs. In the United States, women-owned businesses account for approximately 16 percent of all jobs in the economy, and with women graduating from university at higher rates than men, that percentage is expected to grow in coming years. Governments around the world are beginning to wake up to the economic benefits of women’s empowerment. Kathy Matsui of Goldman Sachs first wrote about "womenomics" in 1999 when she advocated that Japan could increase GDP by as much as 15 percent by tapping the potential of women. Fifteen years later, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has made greater female workforce participation the cornerstone of his strategy to accelerate the Japanese economy and has proposed new policies that will address childcare, tax distortions, and female representation in government. In most economies, significant barriers inhibiting women from reaching their full potential remain. A recent International Monetary Fund paper shows a GDP per capita loss as high as 27 percent in some regions as a result of not fully engaging women in the labor force. In certain countries, the loss is even bigger. The IMF paper estimates that in Egypt, for example, raising women’s workforce participation rate to that of men would lift the country’s GDP by more than a third. Globally, gains in women’s participation in the labor force have stalled; women continue to work in lower paying and less productive sectors than men; and there are still laws in many countries that restrict women’s movements and choices. A World Bank study shows that almost 90 percent of the 143 economies researched still have at least one legal restriction on women’s economic opportunities, including seventy-nine economies that restrict the types of jobs women can perform. There is also a lack of role models to inspire more women to join the workforce and change societal attitudes.  In addition, women are less likely than men to know other entrepreneurs and more likely to have weaker professional networks. Finally, access to capital remains a significant constraint to engaging women productively in the world economy. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) estimates that 70 percent of women-owned SMEs in the formal sector in developing countries lack access to capital, resulting in a global financing gap of $285 billion. In 2008, Goldman Sachs launched the 10,000 Women initiative to address the constraints facing women entrepreneurs in emerging markets by providing them with business training, mentoring, and networking opportunities. A new evaluation of the program conducted by Babson College, and released at the Council on Foreign Relations today, demonstrates that targeted interventions can indeed help women grow their businesses and create jobs. The study found that nearly 60 percent of graduates created new jobs, on average more than doubling the size of their workforce. Eighteen months after graduation, nearly 70 percent of the women had increased revenues, and the average growth across all participants was 480 percent. The potential to replicate these results on a broader scale by providing more women with greater access to business training, mentoring, networking, and capital is enormous. Goldman Sachs 10,000 Women is expanding its efforts and has recently launched a new partnership with IFC, a member of the World Bank Group, to create the first ever global finance facility dedicated to women entrepreneurs. The facility will enable approximately one hundred thousand women entrepreneurs around the world to access capital and grow their businesses. With 126 million women starting or running businesses in sixty-seven economies around the world, improving their growth prospects will reverberate throughout the global economy and ultimately lead to healthier, safer, and more prosperous communities—for everyone.
  • Asia
    Women’s Achievements and Continued Challenges in Afghanistan
    Early this summer, a group of congresswomen returned from a visit to Afghanistan. Their takeaway: “Women are now participants—and in many cases, leaders—in a society that once systematically subjugated them.” Indeed, women in Afghanistan have made great strides in recent years, but many challenges remain—especially in the face of imminent U.S. withdrawal from the country. A recent World Bank report, titled “Women’s Role in Afghanistan’s Future: Taking Stock of Achievements and Continued Challenges,” explores the advancement of women’s rights in Afghanistan following the fall of the Taliban in 2001. A follow-up to this 2005 World Bank Report, the publication evaluates women’s development and participation across four sectors of society—health, education, work and employment, and legal rights and voice. It also provides recommendations for the country to continue its focus on gender as part of a national development strategy. The report highlights key advancements for women across all four sectors, particularly applauding the progress that has been made in the realms of health and education. Since 2005, Afghanistan has seen a boost in both maternal health and infant survival ratios. My colleague Isobel Coleman and I detailed some of these advancements in our 2011 working paper. The maternal death rate is now 327 per 100,000 live births, down from an estimated 1,600 per 100,000 live births. Similarly, the infant death rate decreased from 115 fatalities per 1,000 live births to 74 per 1,000 live births. In addition, the percentage of women aged fourteen to forty-nine who use contraception has increased since 2005, rising from only 5 percent to 21.2 percent. Afghanistan has nearly doubled the number of health facilities capable of providing adequate reproductive care from 1,214 to 2,047 and has vastly expanded its network of qualified female health professionals. With regard to education, the report cautiously lauds the increase in the number of girls attending all levels of school as well as the expansion of the government’s network of schools. The proportion of female primary school students is now at 40 percent, up from 34 percent in 2005, and women now account for 35 percent of secondary school students. The proportion of female university students has remained static since 2005 at 19 percent. However, the actual number of both male and female university students in Afghanistan has been increasing annually. Alongside the progress, however, there is significant room for further gains: all of these figures remain low by international standards. Malnutrition, domestic violence, forced marriage, child marriage, illegal abortion, and mental health issues remain widespread. In addition, the Afghan educational system continues to suffer from a lack of female teachers, inadequate sanitation facilities, and critical security threats, including poisoning incidents and other attacks on girls’ schools. To further advance the health and education of women in Afghanistan, the report recommends increasing investment in human resources, including mental health professionals. Women’s employment status and legal rights have seen much more limited advancement since 2005. As noted in the report, women continue to be primarily employed in informal, home-based work and are significantly under-represented in the private workforce. When women do work outside the home, it is mainly in low-income jobs such as tailoring, cooking, and domestic services. Only 3.5 percent of urban women—and even fewer in rural areas—are employed by the government, and just 21 percent of the entire female urban workforce is employed. Women also remain under-represented as professionals in the legal system, comprising less than 10 percent of judges, attorneys, and prosecutors. This serves as a barrier to women’s access to justice and decreases the number of women who report gender-based violence. While women have significantly increased their numbers in the political process, with greater female voter turn-out and more female candidates running in elections, female candidates continue to experience harassment, intimidation, and security threats. They also have fewer resources to spend on polling observers, making them disproportionately affected by voter fraud. The report suggests that legal reform continue in Afghanistan in order to expand the rights of women and that greater investment be put towards female professionals in all fields, especially in the private and legal sectors. To protect and advance women’s rights, development, and participation in society post-2014, the World Bank recommends that Afghanistan focus on: A political settlement that includes women to achieve stability Security developments to advance women’s safety in public places, including schools and the workplace Increasing the number of female workers across all sectors and geographies, including the most under-served areas Engaging religious leaders on key issues pertaining to women’s participation in society These recommendations have the potential to work in tandem with the policy suggestions laid out by CFR Fellow Catherine Powell in her most recent working paper. While the World Bank’s recommendations are addressed to the Afghan government, Powell directs her recommendations to the U.S. government, particularly following the withdrawal of U.S. troops in 2016. The structures Powell recommends creating within the U.S. government, such as a National Security Council–led interagency working group, would support the economic, development, and political stability goals outlined by the World Bank. Afghan women are contributors to their societies.  And with further investment and support from their own government and the international community, they will continue to play a role in building a more stable, secure future for their country. It is in the international community’s best interests that their efforts succeed. For more information on women in Afghanistan, please see CFR Fellow Catherine Powell’s recent working paper, “Women and Girls in the Afghanistan Transition.”